Passing on a family jewellery or watchmaking house: planning succession without fracturing the family

A standard business transfer and a family succession are not managed the same way. In the first, only price and warranties matter. In the second, additional stakes emerge that figures never capture: perceived fairness among heirs, the successor's legitimacy in the eyes of staff and long-standing clients, and the preservation of a name that remains attached to the family long after its capital is transferred.

For a jewellery or watchmaking house, these stakes are compounded by a constraint specific to the sector: craftsmanship and client relationships often rest on a small number of key people, sometimes the owner alone. A poorly prepared succession therefore does not only risk family cohesion, it risks the survival of the craft itself.

The right successor profile cannot be decreed by bloodline alone

The ideal family successor combines several conditions rarely found in the same person: genuine rapport with the current owner, shoulders strong enough to bear the future leadership, sincere motivation for the business, and empathy towards employees and the house's long-standing partners alike. Bloodline alone guarantees none of these criteria.

Our conversations with owners of family houses in the sector show that an objective assessment, conducted by an outside perspective before roles become fixed within the family, avoids costly mistakes: handing leadership to a child with no genuine appetite for the business, or conversely overlooking a legitimate profile simply because they were not the originally presumed successor.

Fairness among heirs, the most common source of rupture

The question of fairness among children remains, in our experience, the most frequent and most durable source of conflict. When one child takes over the business and appears to receive everything, the others feel wronged, a resentment that often outlives decades and spills well beyond the professional sphere.

The arrangements that work explicitly separate the transfer of power from the transfer of wealth: the successor obtains leadership and the shares necessary for authority, while the other heirs receive equivalent patrimonial compensation in other forms, real estate, a portfolio, or non-voting shares. This separation, discussed upstream with outside counsel, defuses most of the tension.

The timeline, the most underused tool

Passing on a family business cannot be improvised in the urgency of a retirement or a health issue. Anticipation remains the key to ensuring continuity of the business, preserving family cohesion and guaranteeing the venture's longevity, which requires planning committed several years ahead of the target date, with clear milestones: training the successor, gradually transferring client and supplier relationships, structuring the transfer legally and fiscally.

For a jewellery or watchmaking house, this timeline must include a milestone often forgotten: the transfer of technical and relational know-how itself, which cannot be delegated in a few months. The houses that succeed in their transmission begin this skills transfer well before addressing the question of capital.

Back to the journal